>>8314317Did you even look at the sources you gave me?
IT's only similar. Nothing is identical.
>Yeah just coincidence. Except it's not a coincidence. Technology had increased in such a way that someone would eventually insert the box shaped box into the box hole.
Just look at all the failed applications of the steam engine. It was invented thousands of years ago, but the person who invented it used it basically as a toy. So no one else used it for an important application, so it was "lost" to time.
The fact we even know about them is because this was recorded somewhere.
Again, people love to boast about this shit and yet here you are thinking the THOUSANDS of people who came to america from China stayed silent.
Again, to even give your claim credence, we also have to pretend that they cleaned up after themselves instead of doing the same shit they had been doing across the other continents and islands they explored.
Again, they would also have to erase ANY records and influence they had on any native people they came across them as well.
>historians haven't disproved their own theories about ChinaThey can't disprove shit that never happened, especially shapes and ideas that don't require any influence for them to be created in the first place.
They didn't go from a stone age to medieval age in only a generation, unlike how indians were highly influenced by europeans during the 1500s.
Didn't take long for any tribe to adapt and learn how to make better metals, better farming, raising livestock, horses and learning how to ride them, etc.
This is why people doubt the Quetzoquatrlrigrzywqk existed, because humans can learn shit just by observing. No giant ships for long trips. Not metal works to imitate. No new weapons to use against their enemies. So it's treated as nothing but a myth.
Just like chinese explorers.
>He wasn't he was a retardSame thing. You are what you pretend to be. He's willfully as ignorant as you.
