>>8316622In response to the question from the previous thread; Rainbow High isn’t perfect but it’s better than anything Mattel or Hasbro are putting out by a mile.
Mattel and Hasbro’s playline dolls are unarticulated with garbage hair fiber and the details are all printed on.
I can’t believe Hasbro has the gall to charge $25 for those Disney Princess “collector dolls” with no knee joints and now arm joints in wave 2. Cinderella in the bigger box is no doubt going to be at least $30, maybe $35. Printed on details on a doll intended for collectors at that high a price? I shouldn’t get this mad about toys but holy shit the audacity of Hasbro to slap the Disney Princess name on this garbage. After Disney yanked the license from Mattel, Hasbro said they were going to do better but just a few years later they’re pulling this. I honestly want Disney to give the license to MGA instead because they’re apparently the only Western toy company that actually knows how to make dolls anymore.
Rainbow High have big cartoony heads and the faces are oddly glossy, but they are so detailed compared to everything else on the market it’s not even a contest.
The MSRP for each RH girl is $26.99, the same price as an LOL OMG. OMGs are already a damn good deal for that price, but Rainbow High tops even that.
Each RH doll comes with full articulation, inset eyes, two high-quality outfits, two pairs of shoes, 2 hangers to hold the outfit she’s not wearing, and a comb and stand in her signature color. These aren’t even collector-tier, these are playline!
If Mattel was making these they would charge $50, and the girls wouldn’t come with inset eyes, a second outfit or hangers.
This is why I stan MGA, because most other companies are JUST-tier right now. (Just Play is decent, they’re #2 after MGA.)
