>>8346467>>8346496See, this would be a valid point, except:
1. I didn't want the watermark to be obtrusive or obnoxious to the point it detracted from its quality as a good visual comparison.
2. This whole thing was mostly just me being pissy about someonne else getting token meaningless informal credits for my anonymous image collages when they get chain reposted around. I'm not really all that seriously invested in this, mostly I'm just distracting myself from quarantine boredom.
3. None of the previous times my comparisons have been reposted have anyone of the reposters really bothered to at all edit them, even when there were shitty editing artifacts accidently/lazily left in them.
4. Honestly, if they do bother to put in the effort to edit the mark out, that means they could have just as easily put the comparisons together themselves, so I don't really care at that point.
