>>8742474>>8742565I don't see what's wrong with it. It offers unique prints and stuff. Having your favourite franchise in Lego form and doing crossovers or other adventures is a great novelty.
Unlicensed sets are just somebody's mocs. You can build those already. You have the pieces.
>>8743097OP is right though. Lego is taking a risk by making a product and will want to at least make it's money back. A big pricetag on an obscure product is not the way to make money.
Now, there are certainly expensive hobbies where the poorfag argument is valid. But people also want to get their money's worth out of what they're buying. You guys are proud that you're able to pay more than others, that you can tackle prices that others won't. Not that you can get nicer stuff. You're proud to be paypigs.
