>>8787500>The 30s, 40s and 50s were a repressive time for sexuality and youth because of this crackdownI clearly didn't work because looking at the Social Security data between 1933 to 188 over 65% of all American Marriages has a child 6 months or earlier meaning most Burgers were banging their brains a lot. Hell that's why the older generations were so sour, they got chained up and wanted their kids to dodge their fate and birth control pills wasn't a thing ready in the market until the 60s, after that the you see more and more "open minded parents" considering their kids "sow their oats"
>The push-back to those youth expressing sexual freedom was both savage and extremeNot in the US, it was very, very slow. Nudity and sex was common in films and it wasn't until sometime in the summer of 1968 MPAA was created and even then it was so broad (Rating were General, Mature and Restricted) that many cheated by with nudity so long as it could be justified, hell nudey mags were in drug stores, really now that I look over it again up until the 90s the US sex market didn't look all that different from Japan's barring the censored genital laws of Japan.
>It's the same thing we're seeing today with the LGBTQI+ and the desire for the freedom of sexuality It's a whole other beast for a lot of reasons, consider that in today's market a kids sexual activity is worse than the last 4 generations combined. Hell on a one for one data shows teenagers were having more sex in Amish settlements, the most puritan teenage group (on paper) is getting more ass than your average high school kid and this is due to the kids being the puritans rather than the adults, Free the Nipple was a media campaign made for a film in 2012 by a bunch of literal boomers a good 8 years ago and on the heels of where now the -youth- are self censoring nudity the wheels are coming off society
>>8787879Hey, why not? slow board and it's not instantiating a lot of derailment yet.
