>>9163146>I mean I originally thought we were talking about the classic design but if you're moving the goalposts to they're based on the New52 lookwho the fuck do you think you're trying to fool?
I've made mention of Jim Lee's design a dozen times now and have been general about comic designs since nearly the beginning
>>9162338Your entire schtick is as bad as that retard from yesterday who claimed Mattel stopped making DC toys after 2018, so either you're him, or we have two massive retards on /toy/
>I'm just staying that more people are exposed to movies nowadays than the actual comics. >actual comicsIs this your way out? Even i don't read their modern comics, but i sure as fuck still continue buying their toys, watch their cartoons, and recognize new designs/characters/stories. You don't have to read their comics or even watch their cartoons to still be bombarded by their characters, because they're literally everywhere.
This is why shit like this sold, despite very few people reading these comics AND despite the DC movies being shat on by nearly everyone. You refuse to understand because you have your little idea stuck in your head like the retarded kid from yesterday.
If what you think is true, 95% of the products (not just toys, but candies, cartoons, ice creams, umbrellas, underwear, headphones, etc etc) being released wouldn't be based on the comic designs. It would be based on the movie shit.
This is clearly untrue given the fact of how little attention is even given to Burton's and 00s Batman, which you thought was some lynchpin. Again, if what you think is true, then all the negativity toward Synder's movies would have brought the rest of DC down too.
>tryhard faggotWhere have i claimed to be some fount of knowledge about modern DC comics? literally nowhere. Instead of nitpicking imaginary claims, how about owning up to how full of shit you were about the DC Icons you were completely wrong about? Fucking hypocritical retard.
