>>9252756This is why commas are important, anon.
>I find it funny that despite having multiple relevant games, since 2009 none of the SF license holders have come close to completing even the original SF2 cast.>I find it funny that despite having multiple relevant games since 2009, none of the SF license holders have come close to completing even the original SF2 cast.Your reading of the sentence is the more awkward and unintuitive of the above two, by the way-- it's clumsy even with the comma in place. To get your intended meaning across, it would have been ideal to put the "2009" part at the end later on in the sentence, like so:
>I find it funny that despite having multiple relevant games, none of the SF license holders have come close to completing even the original SF2 cast since 2009.This connects the year unequivocally to the license holders' actions, with no uncertainty about connections to the games themselves. This has been your English lesson for the day, you illiterate fuck.
