>>9626550Okay, let's have a go at breaking this down:
- You dismissed the PNAS article because it 'only' compared physical scans of brains (despite literally advising me to look up "research on the neurological difference between male and female brains", but that's by the by).
- That last link was, in response to the above, to highlight the explicit relationship between the distribution of tissue in the brain and a trait relevant to the discussion.
If you thought I posted it as another piece of research into gender differences, then that really shows how well you've been reading anything I post.
>cherrypickingYou can choose not to believe me as I can't prove it either way, but those were actually the first two relevant articles I came across. However, the fact that you specified "any research" would put you in the wrong even if I HAD cherrypicked them.
Also, it's not like they're taken from obscure, non-peer-reviewed sources either - one's from the flagship publication of the "world's largest association of psychologists" and the other's from the most-cited journal in the world after Science.
Finally, "cherrypicking" is only a valid defense if you don't supply evidence that my examples are far outweighed by research to the contrary.
Therefore, if you want me to not "hit and run", post the research that suggests otherwise. In the interest of fairness let's say that you can go back as far as the older article (2005), but your argument will have more weight if it's as recent or more than the other (2015) and all research must come from reputable, peer-reviewed sources.
If you manage to find and post it, we can continue, but otherwise you'll have lost this discussion and, perhaps more importantly, officially be a faggot.
