>>9671013>still repeating anecdotal evidence from amazon and youtube, pretending it's not anecdotal, because he can't stop being wrongsure is tard who holds strongly to his incorrect beliefs
>t's been documented. LOL, where? amazon reviews? youtuber review? fwoosh forum? All as anecdotal as our posts on /toy/.
>they changed the joints to be of a stronger material. Yes, DCC released a statement saying they changed to another plastic, but all the while saying that the Lexan plastic they used was stronger than most materials and passed their QC testing, because polycarbonate is one of the most durable plastics out there and why it's used for bullet proofing.
Basically, they admitted to no wrong doing and just changed plastics due to demand from their customer base.
Like i said, if DCC was able to produce toys with even smaller joints with nary a complaint and people like myself handle their TAS toys with no issues at all, it just sounds like a bunch of new collectors bought into the TAS line and had no idea collector toys can't be hamhanded like Kenner and Mattel toys could be.
> Your assumption that it's just ham hands says more about you breaking your own toys than anything. How many Mything Legions are you going to break with your swollen mitts?Are you stupid or just stupid? You're trying to say I'm hamhanded, despite me owning toys you're claiming are fragile, where i have no issues with them and after clearing any stuck joint issues, these toys were then abused by children playing with them. Again, i have toys with even smaller joints that use clear plastic and they held up to play for nearly a decade.
A modern mythic legion figure can't survive a 3 inch fall without a peg breaking. My early TAS Catwoman and many other clear jointed figures fell from even greater heights without issue.
Sounds like Mythic Legions are the ones with shitty plastics, while DCC with clear joints are actually durable.
