>>9709695You compared that to Windblade. That means you think it's equivalent comparison, and that a consumer could pick one or the other. Since the primary draw to Windblade was because she was a fembot, and you believe the thing you posted is a suitable substitute to Windblade, it stands to reason that you must believe what you posted is a female robot.
If not, why would you post it? Why would you believe it was a suitable comparison? Surely you wouldn't believe that someone who was looking for a Fembot would be satisfied by the exact opposite, would you? Or do you perhaps have some ulterior motive, such as an opposition to fembots in general?
