/toy/ - Toys » Thread #9708082

[45 / 12 / 15]

1000KiB, 1200x1240, IronMen.jpg

Anonymous Sun 03 Apr 2022 22:28:45 No.9708082 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>9708283 >>9708313 >>9708318 >>9708447 >>9708725

Not to sound like a scalefag, but why did the divide start between 1:12 and 1:10? It seems weird having two scales that fulfil more or less the same "niche" despite being different enough that they can't really be displayed together. It's not like 1:6 vs 1:12, as those are completely different sizes. I would have thought 1:10 would have made more sense from an ease of design perspective, just because a tenth seems like a more "regular" fraction than a twelfth, though I do generally prefer 1:12 as a scale for figures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 00:33:43 No.9708283 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708082
>westernshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 01:01:23 No.9708313 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708082
>1/10
I've never seen toys sold as 1/10 scale. must be some capeshit hasblo or neca shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 01:03:47 No.9708318 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708082
>just because a tenth seems like a more "regular" fraction than a twelfth
I assume 1/12 started for the western marked, since it perfectly scales down with feet.

Dartus05

Dartus05 Mon 04 Apr 2022 02:10:24 No.9708384 Report

Quoted By: >>9708426 >>9708447 >>9709757 >>9710335

The 1/12 scale is easy to US mesuring, since 6" would be the equivalent to 6 foot, which is an american man's average size. 1/10 would make more sense in the rest of the world, but US has most of the big toy companies and they established the 1/12 scale as the norm and Asian toys have followed that norm too since the 2010s.

In the rest of the world that uses the metric system the 1/10 would make more sense.

I think the 1/10 actually exists only because of companies using legal loopholes to license figures that already have the license in the 1/12th scale.
That's why Marvel Select and DC Direct (in its time) do most of their figures in the 1/10 scale to avoid competing with their retail counterparts Habsro Marvel Legends and Mattel DCUC (in its time).

Then there's Todd McFarlane that wanted to differentiate from othe toy lines and pop in the shelf by making bigger figures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 02:36:14 No.9708426 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708384
As an engineer scaling is not an issue for product. No one would scale something up or down to fit a certain arbitrary size. Computers exist, and have no issues with math.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 02:56:05 No.9708447 Report

Quoted By: >>9708452 >>9709718

>>9708082
>1:10
Worse, why Hasbro says Black Series is 1:12 like Marvel Legends but everything in BS is so small compared to ML.

>>9708384
>Then there's Todd McFarlane that wanted to differentiate from othe toy lines because sheer autism
ftfy

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 03:01:35 No.9708452 Report

Quoted By: >>9708634

>>9708447
None of hasbros toys are in a scale, and i wish people would shut the fuck up about it. The only toys that are in scale to one another are model kits. If half your figures are not the correct height, there is no scale.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 04:24:10 No.9708545 Report

Quoted By:

Actual explanation: companies are less likely to give out 1:12 or 1:6 licenses because those are already represented. So they go for a weird scale that doesn't have anything else out in it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 05:25:14 No.9708634 Report

Quoted By: >>9708803

>>9708452
kek is simply amazing, you put Dr Doom next to Darth Vader and looks like Mr. Olympia in full armor side by side with some dad in costume. Trying to put them side by side with some McShit is even more hilarious since they are at least one head taller than anything.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO spot the mcfarlane.jpg, 161KiB, 800x759

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 06:38:20 No.9708722 Report

Quoted By: >>9709757

There was no divide.

1:10 scale basically started because collector companies sell fewer toys than children toy companies, so they have to charge more for their toys. They also have smaller budgets to work with than children toy companies, which is why so many collector toys didn't have much articulation for the longest time.
In order to give customers more bang for their buck, collector companies started producing larger toys. The reasons they gave is because you can pack in more detail, but that really hasn't been true since McFarlane's time. Customers would still see the larger toy and just think "wow, it's big so it MUST be expensive", even though that inch difference isn't actually expensive (molding reasons).

So basically, 1:10 is a gimmick to get people to buy their toys.

BTW, 1:12 scale was also a gmmick. Back in the 90s, 5" (1:15 scale, but not really, since figures were just 5" instead of being scaled) became the defacto scale for action figures. McFarlane wanted to make his toys stand out, so he started making their toys larger than other lines at the time. So a lot of his figures were 6" and other companies slowly started to copy that, to the point that 1:12 became the popular scale in the 00s.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 06:41:34 No.9708725 Report

Quoted By: >>9709044

>>9708082
i just hate the scale of whatever Fuckmarlane does

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 07:44:21 No.9708803 Report

Quoted By: >>9709578

>>9708634
>Dr Doom next to Darth Vader and looks like Mr. Olympia in full armor side by side with some dad in costume
Isn't that correct, though? Doom will have comic book proportions while Star Wars has skinny actors in costumes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 13:07:28 No.9709044 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708725
Maccy F's is 1/10 I believe. Very loosely anyway, the guy's stuck in the 90s and thinks that means everyone should be 7" tall regardless of how tall they're supposed to be. See: how he fucked up the scale of the Battle Sister compared to the Space Marine. The Marine should tower over her but Todd has no idea what he's doing, so we ended up with an oversized Sister.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO mugshot.jpg, 486KiB, 1440x1612

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 19:58:11 No.9709578 Report

Quoted By: >>9709654 >>9709711 >>9709718

>>9708803
Except David Prowse (Vader body actor) was a huge guy, 6'7'' tall and a body builder. In costume he would be nearly 7, STILL Doom looks massive side by side with him. Marvel official wiki lists Doom as 6'2'' guy that approaches 6'7'' WHEN in armor, but hey they also says his armor weight 190lbs so who knows, comic book magik I guess. Anyway, is fun how small everyone on BS is near any ML figure, but the same company swears they are in the same scale.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 20:49:28 No.9709654 Report

Quoted By: >>9709702 >>9709711

>>9709578
Marvel and black series are fake geek toys. They are for people who want to pretend to be quirky. So are dc, except for comic specific costumes. The dark knights metal figures were great.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:29:58 No.9709698 Report

Quoted By: >>9709757

The reason for many instances may be in licensing and how that's dealt with. The more product lines an IP can broken up into, the more profit for the licensor. For instance, Marvel Select is allowed to exist solely because it's 1/10 scale since Hasbro has the hold on 1/12 scale Marvel stuff at that specific price point. By Marvel/Disney awarding one company the license to make 1/10 figs and another the license to make 1/12 figs, they earn more royalties from all the product and both companies (Hasbro and DST) get to also make money.

Licensing specifics is often the answer to a lot of the weird shit that make not make sense to the consumer.
Specific companies may even be restricted to specific materials (plastic, metal, soft goods, etc), distribution locations/countries, or amount of articulation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:33:49 No.9709702 Report

Quoted By:

>>9709654
>Marvel and black series are fake geek toys. They are for people who want to pretend to be quirky.
You just described the Funko Pop line

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:44:28 No.9709711 Report

Quoted By:

>>9709578
I’m not sure the reasoning behind it, but Hasbro uses two different scales for their 1/12 figures. Their Marvel and Rangers are in a “heroic” scale, while Star Wars and Ghostbusters are in a more “real life” scale. It makes Star Wars look shrimpy when mixing them with any other line.

>>9709654
Stop. Trolling is against the rules and you’re only making yourself look like an idiot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 21:49:54 No.9709718 Report

Quoted By: >>9710319

>>9708447
>>9709578
I watched a panel with a sculptor for the Black Series. He said they actually take the height of the actors and do the math to figure out how tall their figure should be for a 6" scale figure. That's why they are smaller than your average ML because there isn't that same hard conversion for Legends figures to follow, especially the comic based ones which have tended to get larger over the years to appear more heroic and have multiple characters sharing the same base bodies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 04 Apr 2022 22:09:13 No.9709757 Report

Quoted By: >>9710399

>>9708384
>>9709698
>I think the 1/10 actually exists only because of companies using legal loopholes to license figures
>Marvel Select is allowed to exist solely because it's 1/10 scale since Hasbro has the hold on 1/12 scale Marvel stuff at that specific price point
see >>9708722

There is no "legal loophole" because licenses exist to make the distinction between all the toys and markets (there's way more ways to split the licenses up than this) they're sold in.
This is why Mezco is able to produce 1:12 scale Marvel figures at the same time Hasbro is making their own Marvel figures. It's why Good Smile was making Overwatch figures in 6" at the same time Hasbro was making theirs.
So what the licenses that were written for Mezco/Good Smile/Diamond/Hasbro/Mattel/etc, it would state that Mattel has the rights to sell their toys in the mass/mainstream markets, like TRUs, Targets, Walgreens. For Diamond, the license would state that they can only sell their toys in the direct market, or specialty stores.

Obviously, this doesn't mean that the license can't be split up between the scales, but there's enough toys out there that shows that they aren't. Companies like Hiya were making DC figures in 1:18 scale when Mattel had the license and i think Hiya was still making 1:18 DC figures while Spin Masters was making their 1:18 line. The clear split here is Hiya sells theirs to direct market, while Spin Masters/Mattel sold theirs in Targets/walmarts/mainstream stores. On the same token, Jazwares is still making Fortnite toys in 1:18 scale, while Hasbro does it in 1:12, despite both selling their toys in mass/mainstream market stores.

Just to note, DC Direct's toys used to be 6" and they switched to larger figures because all the other collector lines were scaling up... or maybe it was DCD that scaled up first? Can't really remember who started making 1:10 figures first.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 03:24:52 No.9710319 Report

Quoted By:

>>9709718
Makes sense. Is not only the scale, BS look much more realistic, the proportions are very human. Vader looks like a man wearing a suit while Doom seems to have come from a comic book. I know it sounds obvious but in person you can see what I mean, one is a small man the other a drawing in 3D.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 03:38:33 No.9710335 Report

Quoted By:

>>9708384
>6" would be the equivalent to 6 foot, which is an american man's average size.
lol the average american man wishes

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 04:47:29 No.9710399 Report

Quoted By: >>9710402 >>9710514

>>9709757
I wrote the second of the posts you're replying to and I agree with everything you're saying. You get it.

Licenses are usually split up by scale and also by price point/level of articulation/distribution channels. That's how the GSC and Hasbro making 1/12 scale Overwatch figures can happen. The IP holder knows both companies are distributing to two different markets, and selling the items at two different price points. The licensees want these differences or rules in how the licensor breaks up the license terms as much as the licensor/IP holder does. Both parties want to make as much product and money as possible.

Marvel Select has to stick to the 1/10 scale, has to limit the points of articulation under a certain amount (however they agreed to count them), has to sell the figures in the same oversized packages they've been using to differentiate them from the smaller packages other companies are using, and is only allowed to produce a certain number of figures each year.

Here's an article from last month about Master Toy Licenses and how the IP holder has to choose and delegate products to various companies. Specifically they look at the DC toy master license, and how Mattel got the license pulled from them which was then broken up into two main parts and McFarlane and Spinmaster now hold major licenses, but nobody has the master toy license anymore. Interesting read.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 04:48:30 No.9710402 Report

Quoted By: >>9710514

>>9710399
Article:
https://toybook.com/is-this-the-end-of-the-master-toy-licensee/

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 06:44:00 No.9710514 Report

Quoted By: >>9711409

>>9710402
That article is all kinds of wrong.
Master license just means you get to make all sorts of products with the license, but Kenner didn't really have it with Star Wars in the 90s. And the 90s is when companies started to split off the licenses a bunch of different ways, hence LEGO making building block Star Wars and Galoob making miniature vehicles. Hasbro had to buy Galoob to get the Star Wars license for minis. Nevermind model kits.
Toy Biz had the Marvel license, mostly because they now owned Marvel and they retained almost everything in house, but there were still shit being licensed out since the 90s. Other companies made the odd collector shit from time to time, including Japan.

>>9710399
>Marvel Select has to stick to the 1/10 scale, has to limit the points of articulation under a certain amount (however they agreed to count them), has to sell the figures in the same oversized packages they've been using to differentiate them from the smaller packages other companies are using, and is only allowed to produce a certain number of figures each year.
I doubt this. 1:10 was basically companies latching onto whatever the trend was for collector toys. Articulation is simply the fact that they're smaller companies who don't have profit margins to make them more articulated and keeping them at their price point. Again, 1:10 scale itself exists because it's adding an inch costs almost nothing. This is how cheap collector companies are.
If you followed the Select line, early Marvel figures were basically McStatues and articulation basically increased as the line became more popular. It's how Hasbro worked too, at least after they stopped using Toy Biz's left overs. They dumbed shit down with their own shit and the MU line slowly got more articulated as it also became more popular.
The fact is, articulation isn't part of how the license is worded, nor is the scale (in this case). Being in different markets is enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 19:35:51 No.9711409 Report

Quoted By: >>9711426 >>9711531

>>9710514
Nah, for people who've collected or followed Diamond Select for a while know that anon speaks the truth about the Marvel Select line having all those weird requirements. The larger than 1/12 scale is also necessary I'm sure to avoid stepping on the toes of Hasbro's Marvel Legends. The guy who does the Q&A's for Diamond have mentioned many times over the years how they are not allowed over a specific POA count and other things so I believe everything that anon said was true.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 19:45:16 No.9711426 Report

Quoted By:

>>9711409
Yes. As a Marvel Select collector, their license terms with Marvel do limit them based on POA count as well. It's been said many times that they aren't allowed to go over 16 POA (but they count them differently than the old school Toy Biz days where they'd count like 30-40 POA per figure), are only allowed to produce a specific number of marvel figures each year including a set number of Disney store exclusives, and have to stick to the current 1/10-ish scale too.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO marvel select spiderwoman.jpg, 22KiB, 265x295

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 20:53:16 No.9711531 Report

Quoted By: >>9711565

>>9711409
>their license terms with Marvel do limit them based on POA count as well. It's been said many times that they aren't allowed to go over 16 POA
This sounds like lies created by someone who stopped paying attention to Diamond Toys in 2012, because Diamond has increased their articulation count from their statueshit days and some figures have way over 16PoA. There's more than a few MS who are as articulated as many MLs today, so that whole "McFarlane-style PoA counting" doesn't add up.
So did MS only have the license to make 8PoA back in the day, then went to 16PoA, and now just Marvel said fuck it? Probably not, because most collector lines followed this same trend. Companies like NECA, Mezco, DCD, etc also went from making McStatues to being as articulated as MLs, because the collector market has grown a ton since the 00s, garnering more sales and these companies were able to increase the budgets to give their figures more acccessories, more articulation, and other cool shit.
And the keyword here is: TREND. Just like 7" figures, all these companies are just copying each other when a gimmick manages to get more sales (yes, larger scales and more articulation is a gimmick).

Also, why would only Diamond be limited in PoA, when companies like Mezco give their figures more articulation than MLs? Diamond has been a long time licensor for Marvel and been buddy-buddy with them long before Disney, yet they're limited? Doesn't add up, especially when you acknowledge the fact that Japan has even more toys in roughly 6" sizes with a ton of articulation, despite the fact that Hasbro also has the license for mass market toys over there.

>are only allowed to produce a specific number of marvel figures each year including a set number of Disney store exclusives
I believe this, because this is actually observed, unlike PoA restrictions

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 21:02:58 No.9711542 Report

Quoted By:

>Subjectanon is here
Well, thread's over I guess.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 21:22:42 No.9711565 Report

Quoted By: >>9711604

>>9711531
I'm not the anon who originally said Diamond has a POA limit but that's been well known for over a decade with their Marvel Select line. Like that guy said, they've counted articulation points different than other companies anyway, so even though they are limited to 16 POA, a double jointed knee will only count as 1 POA even though it's technically 2 by most other company counting terms. Same for wrists and shoulders. Even though they have swivels and hinges, each wrist or shoulder is only counted as 1 POA.

Those Spider Woman figs would be counted at 13 POA (2 ankles, 2 knees, 2 hips, 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 1 neck) even though most POA counters would count that as a couple more since the shoulders and hips have more than 1 plane of movement each.

I don't work for Diamond so obviously can't know the real reason why like you said, Mezco probably doesn't have an issue with super articulating the 6" tall Marvel stuff, but those are a much higher price point, and not sold at retail. The license terms for allowing Diamond to produce Marvel Selects are most likely to differentiate them from Legends as much as possible to keep both Hasbro and Diamond happy I'd assume. Hence the larger packaging, limit on number of releases per year, articulation (even though that's apparently a non-factor these days), etc.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Marvel Select Black Suit Spider (...).jpg, 68KiB, 1067x600

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 21:40:40 No.9711604 Report

Quoted By: >>9711648 >>9712064

>>9711565
The limit doesn't make sense though, because MS has been releasing ML-amount of articulation for more than a while now.

Is Disney afraid Diamond would make a super duper articulated action figure, putting everyone else in the stone age?

BTW, if you ever look at the Hasbro license with Marvel, it spells out the types of toys they're allowed to make and even where they can be sold (not just countries, but also store types). Doesn't mention scale anywhere. Why would Diamond's be so specific, when in the 00s and 10s, there was almost no one else making Marvel toys? They wouldn't have been stepping on anyone's toes.
In fact, specifically says what toys they're not allowed to make and even brings up Diamond. Diamond is mentioned as just (adult) collectibles.

What you guys believe is true is only based on what you see, ignoring that trends actually dictate the form of the toys. IT'd be like believing Figmas are only licensed to make cartoony styled figures, not understanding that that style only exists because of the sculptors they use. ... or i'll just repeat myself: It'd be like believing Diamond are only licensed to make Mcstatues, not understanding the limited articulation and pre-posed sculpt was that way because that's what collectors expected in the 00s.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ScarletWitch1__68243.1615327594.jpg, 155KiB, 617x1280

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 21:59:40 No.9711648 Report

Quoted By: >>9711833

>>9711604
You clearly didn't read the post I made that you're quoting about how they've always counted POA differently.

I believe DST would count the POA in that Spiderman's arm as having 3POA (shoulder, elbow, wrist), while other companies would count it as 7 POA (shoulder swivel, shoulder hinge, bicep swivel, two elbow hinges, wrist hinge, wrist swivel)

I'm not saying I know WHY, but some odd licensing terms such as the one involving POA exists or existed at one point in time, but the Ask DST Q&A guy would frequently mention it when answering questions submitted. Look, the Marvel Selects are still always described as having "16 points of articulation" in Previews to this day.

https://www.diamondselecttoys.com/marvel-wandavision-scarlet-witch-select-action-figure/

By my count, Wanda has many more than 16 POA, but that's how DST counts it and they've always made a point to state that.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO hasbro license entails.png, 209KiB, 291x1087

Anonymous Tue 05 Apr 2022 23:47:57 No.9711833 Report

Quoted By: >>9711969

>>9711648
>they've always counted POA differently.
Like i said, that's McFarlane-style counting and it doesn't make sense how they count PoA, because it literally has as many PoA as an ML.

We're talking about licenses here, hence the Marvel license needing to spell out what Hasbro ISN'T allowed to produce. They're super fucking anal about this shit, because lawyers.
So if Diamond's license had language about PoAs, it would also be specific on what constitutes a PoA and what it DOESN'T.
It's ridiculous to say the license restricts the PoA, because why would it? Because of Hasbro? If it's because of Hasbro, the same language would also exist with Hasbro and Marvel's lawyers would define what PoA means for them as well. So a PoA for Diamond is exactly what a PoA would mean for Hasbro. The fact that MS have as many PoA as they do (that spiderman actually has more JOINTS (read: McFarlane style PoA) than MLs too) just doesn't make sense, if the license had restrictions for PoA.

So again, why is there a restriction on the PoA from a licensing standpoint if their figures have as many PoA (even McFarlane style counting) as other lines, if not more? It's completely arbitrary to just include that clause.

Again, to use an actual example of how licenses work: Hasbro's license specifically mentions Diamond to show what toys they CAN'T sell/make. It's to spell out to Hasbro where the other licensors' toes are and how to avoid stepping on them, because those licenses exist as described in their specific forms.
... and it also includes descriptions of what they can make, but that's not important here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 00:54:53 No.9711969 Report

Quoted By: >>9712006

>>9711833
Hey now, I don't know the reasoning as to why DST had claimed they had POA restrictions over the years, but I'm just letting you know that people interacting with the public from DST have always said that over the years and they still always claim exactly 16 POA in their solicitations all these years later as if it's a strange legal requirement of some kind. I'm bowing out because there's nothing else to discuss and you seem way more invested in arguing licensing terms that I don't give a shit about. I'm just the anon who added to another anon's response about the POA count thing.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ML vs MS hulk.jpg, 390KiB, 1200x900

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 01:17:59 No.9712006 Report

Quoted By: >>9712055

>>9711969
any source on that?

Also, could it have been a thing about BUDGET? Because like i said earlier, it's one of the reasons why almost every toyline usually starts off with less articulation and eventually gets better if it's successful (unless it's Mattel).

So the restriction would be from how many molds they're able to fit within their budgets, which is affected by how many pieces a toy is made out of, and the more articulation there is, the more pieces need to be made.

Also also, that other anon just sounds like one of those "loop hole" idiots, who think people can try and pull a fast one over lawyers, despite the fact that contracts like the licenses from decades ago we're talking about are full of language to prevent that shit from ever happening.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screen Shot 2022-04-05 at 9.43.3 (...).png, 60KiB, 718x140

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 01:45:02 No.9712055 Report

Quoted By: >>9712117 >>9712120

>>9712006
Not that anon, but he's right. I checked the most recent Select listings and they do still specify 16 points which is odd to keep if some rule or requirement never existed. Some solicitations even say "includes Marvel Select's STANDARD 16 points of articulation" which is a weird thing to even have when obviously many of their figures have a clear variation in articulation.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screen Shot 2022-04-05 at 9.46.2 (...).png, 1MiB, 931x670

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 01:48:11 No.9712064 Report

Quoted By:

>>9711604
Weird. Even the black movie spiderman is listed on the DST site as having 16 articulation points. How do they count them and why is this even a thing? There had to have been some reason for it to continue for so many years.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 02:18:26 No.9712117 Report

Quoted By:

>>9712055
>standard
lmao
holy fuck wat
"Standard" is another way to say "MINIMUM" or "NORMAL." It's EXPECTED.
That doesn't mean
>It's been said many times that they aren't allowed to go over 16 POA

holy shit why are you guys bad at english.

They're fucking ADVERTISING that number to you and using a google, it's fucking included in almost every description for their figures. Seems liek they're just fucking lazy in changing their copypasta, because it's used on figures that are clearly more articulated than others.

pic of the last time they changed their copypasta, because it actually has 16poa.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO abomination ms.jpg, 167KiB, 1240x1500

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 02:20:13 No.9712120 Report

Quoted By: >>9712167 >>9712747

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 03:00:51 No.9712167 Report

Quoted By:

>>9712120
>holy shit why are you guys bad at english
Yet I nearly had an aneurysm trying to comprehend the last half of your post with all that prefect grammar, spelling, and syntax

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 15:16:25 No.9712747 Report

Quoted By: >>9713312 >>9713699

>>9712120
>holy shit why are you guys bad at english.
Says Mr. "Diamond Dozen" and "No-Nothing".

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Apr 2022 21:53:04 No.9713312 Report

Quoted By:

>>9712747
>No-Nothing
Fucking kek I remember this

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DCD Blue Beetles.jpg, 45KiB, 761x900

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 01:41:44 No.9713699 Report

Quoted By: >>9714105

>>9712747
can you out yourself as an ESL any harder? Probably a newfag too considering how popular those misnomers are on 4chan.

It's no wonder why you thought ADVERTISEMENTS were somehow stating some restriction.
The fact that nearly every company made smaller figures before switching to 1:10 scale just shows there was never such a restriction in the first place.
It was companies simply following a trend.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Apr 2022 09:06:23 No.9714105 Report

Quoted By:

>>9713699
>can you out yourself as an ESL any harder? Probably a newfag too considering how popular those misnomers are on 4chan.
>I was only pretending to be retarded
Lol. Lmao even.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches