>>9930103>Souce? I don't see it being mentiond on wiki.You get your info from wiki???? NGMI.They pegwarmed hard and never released wave 2.
>That toy companies use.So then you admit you're retarded. Toy companies cited video games eating their lunch because they had the fucking sales
data.It was not just some poor excuse, dumbfuck.
>You forgot that at that time Mattel and Hasbro started to buy all their competitors.What the fuck are you even blathering about? You're supporting my point because you can't understand it. Stores closed due to poor sales, which had nothing to do with Mattel and Hasbro buying competitors, and they were able to buy their competitors because sales were bad enough to weaken the little guys to need the bailout. Mattel and Hasbro had the money to do so, and again, playsets started to dwindle and Mattel and Hasbro never brought those back up to 80's level just because they bought their competitors.
>Imma different guy!!Okay, but you're on the same IQ level you chimp.
>I heard TRU wnet bankrupt due to outside causes, not beacuse of salesI'm glad "you heard" that you parrot, but I never said TRU went out of business due to sales. TRU sold a lot of video games too, as well as clothes and Babies R Us shit. They had to diversify after the 80's toy trends started to suffer.
>you ignore that Mattel and Hasbro killed the competition.Cite some sources that they caused people to buy less toys overall. You clearly don't grasp how business works, larger businesses poach competitors all the time, it doesn't ruin the entire industry.
>Caliming that video game toys aren't sucssesfulYou really are an ignorant retard who can't even grasp basic reading comprehension. I never said they weren't successful, just that they are not the same LEVEL of success as the 80's toys. You can be successful selling a million units of a toy and still never reach the success of those who sold 100 million units (like 80's MOTU, GI Joe, let alone Star Wars)
