>>3205(cont.)
...have declared by fiat that these views of ours are invalid. Race is a social construction, there is no debate (though see the Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy's article on Race, specifically the section on racial population naturalism, for a competing academic perspective). There is nothing wrong with whites becoming a minority population in North America and Europe, there is no debate. Hate speeh must be oppressed for the good of women and minorities, there is no debate. You are not even allowed to acknowledge the existence of this leftist movement to which we are opposed. When questioned, they just say "I don't know what a SJW is, I don't know what a leftist is, we are not ideologically motivated, we are merely rational, we are merely rational, we are merely good and just."
So we have a very strange little movement here, of impolite views that would get us laughed out of any enlightened circle. So that would make anyone a little combative. We want to spread and convince others, we want to probe and see who else out there thinks like us. We think what we're fighting for is important. There does come a point where publicity can become bad publicity, but if you make a lot of noise, people get interested.
And before you say "yeah posting on a Mongolian teacup forum is real brave", please stop and consider how deeply important art and culture are for the development of politics. People are hardly ever brought to their political positions by rational arguments. Politics is fundamentally about tribal association; that's why groups like liberals and conservatives cluster around seemingly unrelated positions, because it's fundamentally about building group identity. If you can get people to associate your tribe with warm happy memories of shitposting and frog memes, they'll be much more sympathetic to you and much more likely to join you when it comes to actually important decisions.
