>>48004074> I said BBND is a shit movementYou didn't explain why
>cutting the Pokémon was unjustified because there was nothing gained for itDoesn't sound like you believe this given you claim bbnd is wrong because the full roster makes you lose shit that has nothing to do with this.
>that making them encounterable or giving them conditions to be found is completely arbitrary or unnecessaryYou're retardedly misinterpreting what I said but ok
>Apparently the fun part of Pokémon is just having the PokémonNot it IS getting them AND having them.
Not to mention the natural consequence of GETTING them is HAVING them.
> Giving context to these encounters like receiving Charmander as a starter early in the game doesn't add to it at all. Breeding a Pichu in Gen II isn't memorable at all despite breeding being a new mechanic and Pikachu only being found near the end of the game.Not a single one of these things is related at all to what pokemon are available in the game.
You didn't actually understand the data part.
>Apparently you don't need fucking anything in Pokémon apart from all the Pokémon in some internal index and that makes it a good game.This is not even a retarded extrapolation to what I said. This is plain wrong, I didn't say this and I went into detail about it.
You can have your special encounters for the regional dex mons AND other mons available, its not a zero sum game. You'll of course ignore this and claim I'm saying its a zero sum game.
>Seems that everything Tajiri said about actually utilizing different ways to find Pokémon was arbitrary.Tajiri, quite literally, wanted to emulate collecting cards/stamps/etc. bbnd is the pro-collecting side. Shills like you are the revisionist side.
