>>27245152Yes, but it's full of autism that is banned on most boards; will post if nobody minds though
>>27245282That is absolutely adorable anon. I think omitting details is alright (I do it all the time) for stylized interpretations of things, just imagine if somebody tried to cartoonify and flat-color a really complicated mecha or something but kept all the details, that'd be hard to look at. It's striking a balance that's important!
I'm really stretching it with pic related though