>>48856483Annoying as this is, if we're going down this road, ostensibly imagination-usurping mega brands (like our board's namesake, for instance) have been doing this for the last, what, 40 years at least? Masters itself doesn't even have anything going for it if you're not already deep enough in Pokemon from other contexts for it to sound appealing.
It always gets me thinking about how the type of people that would have been modern pop culture junkies had they been born in recent years expressed those traits; the the type of person prone to that certainly isn't new.
>>48867268 