>>21087170That one's not really possible since it uses some 3-pixel long segments. The ones in
>>21086468 are blown up 200% so each pixel would have to be multiples of 2. In the attached pic I pointed out those segments, and as you can see when it's scaled down it loses its intended shape because of the 3-pixel long segments.
At the bottom are two examples that use the correct pixel size to try to get close to that shape.
