>>12359427>What about it doesn't fit with the game?The number of pokemon that would need to be retconned is huge, not to mention, how would they explain this? "Oh hey, yeah, so when this pokemon/move wasn't good against this type, suddenly it is just because." No, this late into the game, this late into everyone getting used to which pokemon is which type and what is good against what, they will not throw a huge fucking wrench into the dynamic of the game just for something new. It would require drastic changes to the whole game mechanic (typing, effectiveness, balance) and it wouldn't be worth it just to add a type that very few pokemon will given.
>Like Smash showing us weaknesses that don't correspond to any existing type?Show me.
