>>51586293>>51586299>>51586300>>51586315>STILL no one has actually pointed out what exactly sprout tower is meant to teach, when teaching the player something is the single attribute that is both necessary and sufficient to make something objectively a tutorialMy argument consists of the following
>For something to be a tutorial, it must serve the purpose of teaching the player something. >Sprout tower does not teach the player anything >Therefore it is not a tutorial There you go, in plain English. 2 premises followed by a conclusion. The conclusion naturally follows from the premises, making it valid, and the premises are true, therefore the argument sound, by the very definition of what those words actually mean. Until someone counters this argument by proving (That’s PROVING btw, not just claiming) either premises to be false, or proving that the conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises that’ll be all from me, adios.
