>>55985680Very true. There's quite a few anons across several boards like myself that have some sort of "gimmick" they throw into their respective general threads. Plus, I'm fairly certain anons would riot if that were the case.
>>55986151Ehh tbf, unless they're a namefag, it's fairly difficult to tell which anon is which unless you're on a poster ID board like /pol/. I'm not too pressed about being confused for Jolteoanon under those circumstances. That's one of the monkey paws of anonymity, after all.
