>>16559360>/fur/Even though I agree that by today's twisted definition of furry almost every Pokemon can be considered fur, that's still simply a remaining vocal minority that lingers and in no way represents us as a board as a whole. Maybe back then it was about half of us or probably closer to a third, but that number has dropped off significantly. I'd still say we're a breeding grounds for it though. I'm pretty sure that's what the minority wants when they shitpost it here and ban evade since there's an actual community on /b/ they choose to avoid while continuing to do so here with great time and effort.
