>>39415513>They haven't shown us any proof of this.A statement about doing something vs assumption of people that the story etc. is going to be shit, hmm now which is more likely to happen...gee I wonder.
>The same stale animations and the same linear routes with one big empty field added in. That's what we get.yeah well, thats an assumption, without any facts.
>"That'll be $10 + $20 Nintendo Online subscription per year. Haha. Better pay or we'll delete your Pokemon.Pokemon Home is for mobile too, there is no way you cant use Home without paying for Nintendo Online sub. Wanna bet?
>They're not doing this. Masuda said that from now on we'll have a limited dex.Yeah well, does GF make all the spin off games? No. Therefore whoever makes the spinoff games, could very well do this. Not saying its likely but its possible.
>>39415631most people who watch that video doesn't seem to agree though, but hey you do you.