>>46852665I never said it was bad, in fact I already said that I liked it. I just have higher standards for what can be considered minor changes.
>>46852680>>46852707I was just validating my previous assumption about the artists style, so it was perfectly relevant. I'm not shitting on them for the style either, just saying that using that particular pic to illustrate "minor changes" was a bad choice. All of their art is pretty good.
>There was no need to bring up anything other than the first three points he made.Restyling her to appear furry was literally one of the points. Being able to hone in on their preferred content from a single pic they drew of a non-furry character speaks volumes to how drastic the changes are. Here's a valid example from the same artist with legit minor changes for comparison.
