>>39698262>You're talking about "good animation" while there's webms showing that the art style gets as janky as the older stuffBut it doesn't.
>proceeds to post a webm full of zoom in garbage because XY can't animate anything making contactTypical. Why bother animating Frogadier actually kicking Barbaracle when you can just zoom in on Frogadier doing a flip in front of the camera and then just cut to after the impact already happened , since XYfags will be hypnotized into thinking it's good animation anyway just because things are moving on the screen, am I right?
>>39698283It doesn't rely on a nausea inducing out of place 3D camera, for one.
