>>19920402>When they never take critique into consideration and/or are always on the defensive, there's a problem. This is a problem.You're operating under a negativity bias. All you see are the times I don't agree with a particular critique, and ignore all the times I have agreed.
For example, even though a previous anon was kinda douchey about his criticism of the orett sprite, he's right. The legs needed to be smaller.
>>19920338i didn't realize that's what you meant. You're right.
Please, let's not get snarky. That always turns things into a clusterfuck
