>>52766996Yeah but WHY are they like that? What does that accomplish? Even if you could theoretically "win" an argument and determine objectively that one starter is better than another, what is the actual point of doing that?
What does any of that shit matter? Why is it bad to pick a "bad" starter? Maybe you wanna challenge yourself a bit more in this piss-easy baby game. Or maybe you just like it's design, or it's just cute. Like what's wrong with liking something that isn't SMOGON curated meta bullshit anyways????
>>52767139I'm asking WHY they do it. For what fucking reason do you NEED to shit on anyone elses taste? Yeah, I don't like to see any starter or pokemon for that matter get needlessly shit on. I think most of the Pokemon designs are just fine and don't need any correction or incessant bitching.
