>>31565740I'm not sure about the "lots of variety". I think that it shouldn't have a LOT of mons to capture very soon, what would vanish the sense of progression. As a matter of game design, I'd say that the player should perceive progression not only about new species, but more species.
In my opinion, having three options of a three monsters evolution line each is great, but giving just one monster is a cool approach, depending of what you want with it. If you want to give a shitty mon just as a placeholder, maybe it would work. Eevee works great too, since the player have lots of options about how to take care of that Eevee... It's more about thinking of what you want to communicate and what you want the player to feel, and then thinking if it achieves your objectives, I guess...
>>31565664I'd take care about the select PokéRides. Excluding a fan-favorite monster from the options could result in disapointment. I'd love to know more about the new Battle and Dialogue system.
What are these PokéBodies?
And here's a quick screenshot from my game. The main character from Pokémon Sage is just a placeholder, please, don't worry about him.
