>>22725428I'm not a footfag, so perhaps I just don't
Get.
It.
But I can't imagine any footfag actually like feet as horribly drawn as that. I mean, they don't wrinkle like real feet would. They don't even look like some simplified representations of "beautiful feet" or whatever like
>>22726703or pic related, which footfags on /co/ tell me are good feet. They're not realistic and they're not stylized.
It doesn't look like she has beautiful feet.
It looks like she has a disease.