>>57472317>Oh you're the same faggot trying to handwave slippery slope away, aren't you?no, as it turns out when you're in the wrong, usually more than one person will disagree with you! funny how that works huh?
>If your conception of realism means that absolutely no fantastical elements can be present, you're a giganiggerUnbelievable that I'm actually reading this, but I guess /vp/ is the gift that keeps on giving in that there's always a more retarded poster
Anon, I'll put this as simply as I can possibly put it: Fantasy, by DEFINITION, is the exact opposite of reality, this is a dictionary definition. You cannot deny this or argue against this, no matter what kind of nigger you say I am. SO yes, BY DEFINITION, "realism" implies the lack of fantasy elements. More realism = less fantasy elements. The moment you introduce ONE (1) fantasy element, you are no longer working within the realm of realism. At that point, any deviation from reality is equally acceptable and drawing arbitrary lines is purely idiotic.
It's unbelievable that this needs to be explained to you. The rate at which this board gets more retarded should be studied by scientists.
