>>27283907Too bad it doesn't look like mud either, just red rubber or socks. So if it doesn't look like hair and it doesn't look like mud and it just like something else that's not supposed to be there, the design pretty much fails, and the name means nothing.
>Please learn to read.>it's literally called mudsdale and is a ground type.>Pretty obvious that's hardened mud around its legs.No that's just you beeing some autist that perceives things through it's names and descriptions and then you force yourself to see it that way. If the horse was called lavasdale you'd be saying it totally looks like lava.
A design that needs descriptions to convey what it's supposed to convey it's a bad design.
