>>36322245Anon, Pokemon aren't real creatures that evolved into their appearance for objective purposes free from scrutiny. They're marketed video game characters that are intended to be cool, cute, or intriguing. If they fail in those departments, then it's valid to call them bad. If a comedy movie doesn't make people laugh, then people can rightfully call it bad. If a dinner turns out unappetizing, then people can rightfully call it bad. If a porn video ends up being unarousing, then people should call it bad. Do you understand? Pokemon as a franchise has always had the specific goal of making their creatures appealing in some sort of way. If people don't say "That pokemon is awesome/adorable/fascinating," then people should call that particular one bad.
