>>19923578Hey you! yes, you! The moron that still didn't understood this
>let's an illegal pokemon throughDid it raised any flag on Pokemon Checker? No. Why? Because if you actually read instead of spouting sarcasm without thinking you'd had understood what i put in
>>19920826>We have reached the point on which generating a correct pokemon, with the correct natures and data, will create the very same value of one that is RNG'd or even Bred/Captured. Their hex values will be the same, the machines will recognize them as in-game pokemon and nothing can be done about it. In layman's terms, you're injecting VALIDLY CODED STRINGS THAT ARE IDENTICAL to those inside your game. But hey! Thank you for proving that you don't know what the fuck are you talking about! Thank you for proving my point that nobody in /vp/ are anything but autists, parrots and the like.
Thank you so much, Mary, for proving my point.
