>>35334144>how about making /vp/ redPersonally, I don't mind and don't care either way. Many people may argue a red /vp/ means countless of porn and imagedumps threads on the catalog, but now, /vp/ is facing the "same" problem, that is countless of leaks, starterwars and Twitter screenshots on the catalog. If had to choose, I would prefer red /vp/, since I think Pokémon porn and imagedumps are more related to Pokémon than the leaks, the starterwars and (especially) the Twitter screenshots, but like I said, either way is fine.
>and changing global rule 3 to include /vp/ along with /b/ and /trash/?I would support it, to mitigate the discussion of anthro. being part of Pokémon or not, since, well, it's quite clear /vp/ houses a great amount of furries and fans of anthro., and that this kind of topic doesn't lead to a good end, no matter in what situation.
But speaking about that, an anon from /qa/, some time ago, has discussed about the problem of furry rule being vague and confusing, and this is what he proposes to improve GR3.
