>>39785247(2/2)
>Why aren't they trying to go bigger? Yes. Sword and shield seems to have a lot of changes to it and seems bigger than most, if not all regions
>Their latest endeavors have been short, simplistic, and have very little to do endgame-wise. Does competitive pokemon not exist? Though I'll give you LGPE
>Why aren't they trying to make "the mother of all Pokémon games" and instead are giving us yet another Sun and Moon, or X and Y? The mother of all games is Sword and Shield and it's been implied go be for awhile by GF
>Their marketing strategy hasn't implied otherwise, or else they'd be showing off a hell of a lot more than they have.Why would they tell you everything in the game before release date?
>Think about how long it's been since they made that announcement, and how little they'e revealed in the meantime. It's appalling.They revealed gigantamax, new pokemon, regionals and new characters. What are you talking about?
>I am a paying customer, damn it. I can take my business elsewhere.Okay then. Maybe you should move to /v/ then.
>The Switch has so many better options, and when it boils down to it, this is the decision that got me to stop playing their new games entirely. Sword and Shield isnt out yet so we dont objectively if it's better. So far your only complaints are that you dont have Botw graphics and you can't have six million mons in a same game.
>They are not 'entitled' to my money. Okay. No one cares
>So please, tell me, why should I buy this game? Seriously, give me a damn good reason.It's comfy af, haz a wild zone, new gigantamax mode, a new meta, cool animations and over 500 different party members to chose from. However if you're seething this hard already, maybe you should wait until the games are out before blogging on /vp/ about your hatred and NEW BAD philosophy
>tldr; Succ my Sword and Shields, I'm not buying it.Tldr:You need to move to /v/ or grow out of your angry, quick to screech manbaby stage of life...or both
