>>47845054>>47845057I understand this point and I completely agree that these kind of pokemon are at least entertaining. In the case of eiscue, im not the biggest fan of its design but at least its a funny idea. The concept of a Stonehenge pokemon is great, but Stonejourner just feels lazy, its nice that they wanted to include this landmark but this feels like the laziest way of executing it. My issue with it now though is that since its clear any pokemon can be left out of the next generation it feels wrong to include these incredibly uninteresting mons in a dex. In defense of eiscue again at least we dont have too many penguin pokemon, stonejourner is just moving rocks again for the xth time