Quoted By:
I've meticulously researched the series and our current situation. The only way out of this is to keep the atmosphere around pokemon negative. When I say negative, I mean critical, not unnecessarily harsh. Criticism needs to be fair, and not baseless. This just harms you argument. Through this, the message will filter down to the average joe consumer (i.e. parents who buy for children, who are likely the largest contributor to pokemon's sales). It's better to target parents because they are usually rational. They are adults and understand the concept of money. Children are irrational and it is harder to convince them not to buy a certain game.
The way we can do this is through making memes and just trying all avenues. If a particular meme goes viral outside of pokemon echo chambers then it will make other people question the idea behind the meme, and as such they will be informed of the situation. This may have a knock on impact on sales. If the negative reception to the games continues, then news hungry games journalists may signal boost our message through articles (though it's likely these articles will be critical of the anti-dexit movement).
Another vital determiner that may get our message across is the reviews of the game. Recently pokemon games have been getting very high scores in reviews, despite the fall in the quality of the series since Gen 6. If there is hype around a game, a game reviewer that isn't heavily invested in the games is likely to be more inclined to give the game a high score. Whereas if there isn't much hype, they'll start questioning the quality of the games. People are very influenced by others. Therefore we must sustain the criticism.
Let's get to work
