>>47264501Argument for what? All you did was say no and insult me, despite there being undeniable and irrefutable proof that I'm correct. All you're doing now is insulting me, despite being corrected. You're clearly too worked up over somebody proving you wrong that you can't coherently talk on the subject.
Feel free to reply once you've calmed down a little.
>Just becuase it's now normal to release an overprices steaming dump doesn't mean it should ever be acceptableNobody said it was acceptable, you must've dreamt that one up.
