>>33363515Because that goes back to the issue of ethics. Why should your mon have to go back in his ball because he's "dangerous"? Your ex-boyfriend just got out of jail for assault, and he's allowed to ride in taxis and go into the grocery store just fine. But poor bisharp has to go away because he "might ruin the goods"? This might be fine for a trained pokemon who's supposed to be big in tournaments, but for a family mon? If my bisharp was around for my mother's death, my baby's birth, and my PhD, I would be livid if he was bound by rules that I see as unfairly harsh.
This is an extreme example, but this is how people think. If a pokemon's a part of the family, why shouldn't it get basic family privileges like simply being materialized in human spaces?
