Quoted By:
This post is coming from someone who considers themselves leaning more towards the leaks being legit, but isn't willing to make a definitive call until more information is presented.
But who exactly makes the better argument? Which side is more believable?
After lurking on countless threads regarding the ''leaked'' starters here's what I have discovered and what I can conclude:
Leakfags:
Pros:
>Has actual evidence and backing to back up their claim.
>The most open minded.
>Some don't mind these not being real.
Cons:
>The most vocal thus being the most annoying. (Making so many threads)
>Most do not seem to understand the concept of skepticism.
Denialfags:
Pros:
>Some are actually approaching leaks from a skeptical view point. Which is to be admired.
>The most entertaining.
Cons:
>A majority of their arguments are either hypothetical, opinionated, and subjective.
>87.5% male argument is the worst.
>Denial and arguments can reach absurd levels if not countered immediately.
>Stubborn
>Usually closed minded. (Inserts le ''shit taste'', furfag, barafag, or faggot meme.)
