>>53237064We're not rating your overall taste, you're being forced to make a difficult pick and we're rating the results. No shit it's a "biased inaccurate reflection of reality". We're not collecting scientific data. It's a bunch of grimy manchildren making fun of each other.
If you want, you can make your own thread where people rate every single Pokemon and see how many people comb through the results to evaluate somebody's overarching tastes.
