>>35215481Why would I specifically go out of my way to do something that *could* create a big problem when I could just not use that specific character and avoid the issue entirely? I obviously have no problem with """"offensive""" humour in a similar subject but I would legitimately like to avoid the spotlight if it could be brought down by doing that. I think if we used a censored bar over the face or even in the way South Park did it could work out fine, but intentionally doing it just seems... needlessly distasteful to me. I've not had much actual arguments for or against it, just "WOAH double STANDARDS BRO???" and I'm honestly indifferent to it
Stop wording it like this is some intense conviction I've made and rule iron-fistedly refusing to think of it in a different light. I just didn't think it was worth the risk if it got picked up by some Islam news organization or something