>>14276058>See how stupid that sounds?Yes, but why did you waste your time typing that out? I never even implied the shit you just spewed.
You were making the argument that Poison-types had a bountiful amount of good Pokemon, and proceeded to make a list that mostly had other types with a secondary Poison typing. If you haven't heard, people usually refer Poison-types, Grass-types, and whatever to Pokemon that have it as a PRIMARY type. Would you call an Empoleon a Steel-type on instinct and not a Water-type?
And even then, your argument proves that Poison is only useful as a secondary type since you've shown that there are barely any good Pokemon that have it as a primary type.
