>>50187104>"it depends on what is is"People like you just say something is degenerate without giving a real reason why it is other than it bothers you, or you just make shit up. Just saying something is sinful and dark doesn't make it true. Besides, the concept of degeneracy can change with time and culture. I believe there are things that are objectively degenerate but sexualizing Pokémon is not one of them.
>you are refuting your original postBased retard.
>their lack of commentary does not warrant your assumptionsI can assume whatever I want about something since it will never actually affect the canon product. As I said before, people can have whatever headcanon they wish. There is not a serious answer to the extent of Pokémon and humans relationships outside of jokes and background info, but you have never cared about that to begin with. Even if people excepted that there is no serious information you would still be upset regardless, because it doesn't fit your headcanon.
I simply have to believe you're just a shitposter because you complain about degeneracy while surrounding yourself with it. I'm just going to shitpost any thread I find with anons like you in it because you are simply not worth responding to.
