>>57193018>80 games vs. 20000 gamestell me you don't understand how to interpret data without telling me you don't understand how to interpret data. Higher winrate doesn't mean shit when the compared amount of games is so lopsided 80 games total is a blip in terms of sample size, it's not enough to draw any conclusions.
A better thing to look at is the top 10ish most registered decks in tournaments, and comparing their overall winrates against each other. It's not a perfect picture, but it's a lot better than whatever the hell you think you were cooking
