>>38591883Glad to be of service. Wish I could say that more often. Hehe.
But yeah, guess the possibility raising offspring scares off potential partners. Not for everyone, I suppose.
Thank you.
>>38591908>>38591952The best posters on this site, in my opinion. Perhaps it's the sheer volume that allows one to easily find like-minded anons.
>>38591983Yes. Human social constructs wouldn't apply there. I'd still prefer to have baby Pokémon of our own, though. To each their own.
>>38592181>What would take to make it good enough?If a mainline game; an ambitious title that at least resembles a title from this decade. Increased number of Pokemon interactions (and animations) not limited to just Refresh/Amie. Comparing today's Pokémon games to titans such as Mario, Zelda, RDR2, and the Witcher just makes me die a little inside, knowing damn well they can do better than that.
If an MMO: Ever play OldSchool RuneScape? Imagine something like that (clean HUD, very user-friendly with simple progression system, decade's worth of relevant content, good community), but with less grind and playing as Pokemon. Everything from gathering, crafting, and combat has purpose, value that fuels the cycle. Also, a development team that cares for the balance and integrity of the game.
>All the anons, really. It hurts me to see so many at such a low point in their life.There are those who have it worse. Threads like these are the least I can do to look out for my fellow anons.
Those threads fill up quickly! Maybe I'll make one on Tuesday if needed.Gee, hope I'm not too wordy >.>
