>>12238473Yes, people of /vp/ There do in fact exist people that are this autistic when it comes to arguments about a type attribute given to a fictional creature in a video game.
In reference to your argument:
>normal>clearly ignoring bows>clearly ignoring ribbons>clearly ignoring the elemental spectrum of the purpose of eeveelution>makes hackneyed argument whilst grasping at straws when all that exists at this time is pure speculation and opinion in the public eyeAs for your new type theory
>noYou arguing about there being an even slight possibility of a new type makes me take you FAR less seriously than the bug-typers and your blatant lack of respect for others' opinions further proves that you are indeed unworthy of serious attention to your arguments.
