>>38926244>But that kinda proves it important in of itself. How does it? The only place that is going on about graphics is here. Nobody else cares, we have realistic expectations for what an annually releasing game should look like and we're fine with it.
>Why can't they it add it in right now? It's stuff from previous games.Because Gamefreak is being retarded on this front. As I said they'll eventually backpeddle and add it in due to the outcry about this because this is an actual legitimate issue unlike the shit I mentioned in my OP.
>Can you seriously not go a year without a new mainline game?Obviously I can if forced to but I don't want to. There's no need, the things that would be added from an extra year of dev time are minor at best.
>No. People will always buy mainline Pokemon games regardless of how flawed and lazy it comes off as.Not an argument. People buy it because they enjoy it. It's that simple. While you keep saying it's lazy I don't find it lazy at all, in fact it's exactly what I want from Pokemon.
>But they aren't higher quality.They are unquestionably higher quality.
>The previous 3DS games suffered from this, what makes you think SWSH won't?I didn't say I'm sure they won't, but I'm not going to sit here and think that just because an underpowered piece of shit handheld like the 3DS struggled to maintain a solid framerate that an actual competant handheld like the Switch won't.
If it gets released and it has a shit framerate then yeah, feel free to complain and I won't even blame you for it.
>>38926265loling, touche touche
>>38926277I'm not going to do any such thing, but you claiming people don't ask for the shit I mentioned when they do it daily (and even some in regards to animations have did it in this very thread along with showing webms).
>Maybe people would be more willing to talk with you if you weren't so dishonestThreads booming nigger. I've had no shortage of people to respond to.
