>>20036209I know it's definitely one of those 2 Gen's but i'm not sure which.
>Gen 2Bland but not ugly starters that just get bigger as they evolve and suck competitively to boot.
>Gen 5Starters that try to get more creative and experimental but end up shitting the bed big time. And they ALSO suck competitively.
I'm not sure if Gen 2 should get the award for not trying at all or to Gen 5 for trying hard yet failing miserably.
