>>50199130>So did Lycanroc & Pikachu who also pulverised the said Cliff & Rock. They need even more energy since they are much much smaller.No they didn't they fragmented it. That's a huge difference. You can see the fragments of the rock lycanroc destroyed fall into the ocean after it's attack. There's only a little bit of the rock triceramon destroyed because the rest of it turned to dust.
>Assumption again, Digimon on V-tamer were much much smaller compare to other digimon in the franschise.I literally showed you the massive gap in size between Triceramon and veedramon, Veedramon is bigger than taichi by a whole head as shown here
>>50198161 meanwhile triceramon is so huge that his leg is bigger than veedramon.
>>50197147>Just like the cliff and rock was much much bigger than Pikachu & LycarocYou know what I'll give you a direct size comparison from the manga itself.
>Ya, a Planetoid inside the mountain Good seems you agree now.
>Which is stilll assumption since we are talking about non-organic creature made of data with no subsistenceWe've seen digimon in the real world. Most of them were heavy. Mammon was so large that it destroyed cars by stepping on them. It's mass had to have been well beyond the car for that to have taken place. So yes while it is an assumption we have evidence to prove that digimon are far heavier than pokemon. Thus shellmon is 10 to 20 tons.
>Which is still bigger than Triceramon scan you postedNo it's not
>Except people who wrote episode of Digimon never cared about physicsThis isn't an argument.
>By that logic, many pokemon would be much more heavier and much more stronger. .Well you can blame the pokedex for that. I would've been alright with assuming something like tyranitar weighing in excess of 2 tons. But the pokedex gave us it's weight. Though you could just say the pokedex is stupid and unreliable which I'd also agree with so maybe the pokemon really are much heavier than they appear.