>>27153677 Even before we begin to examine the details that I will deliver anon, can anyone really suggest that Greninja, given the information presented to us in regards to human love and normal desire, is a desirable mate? Can anyone, at the altar, or even just as a trainer, conceivably believe that they would never revolt towards its diseased condition and physiologically dirty features? Can anyone ever suggest that nausea would never come of this, consciously or otherwise? Is this the character you wish to stare into the eyes of and smell the breath of on a moonlit midnight following an expensive dinner (payed by you, the trainer, of course)? Is this character “kissable”? Is it “savory”? Can one find the fire and exuberance that lies within its glazed, squinted eyes? Is it one that demands by your complete instinct and ancestral conscience that you make unscrupulous intimate contact with? Can one bear the mucous membrane of its mouth, or the exposure to its flesh in contact? And for the rest of your life? Can on suggest it be a proper and stable caretaker, even of its own kin?
Thus, we conclude that Greninja is not merely a poor composition between the frog and the human, but also a regression of both, essentially worse off in both health and beauty than either species. Only those who have no faith in their own character or looks are willing to try and extend themselves to a completely foreign character in both beauty, aptitudes, interests, and personality.
